Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 11:32:23 -0700 From: Norm Matloff To: Norm Matloff Subject: more on Microsoft deception re H-1B To: H-1B/L-1/offshoring e-newsletter Before I get into the topic at hand, just to make sure everyone is on the same page here let me say first for you non-techie readers out there that most computer-related H-1Bs are software developers. In other words, when for instance Microsoft, the subject of my posting here, says they need H-1Bs to fill jobs that they can't find qualified Americans for, they mean software developers--not, say, call center staffers, technicians and the like (which the H-1B program does not cover anyway). If you'd like confirmation of this, see a Bloomberg article I reviewed recently, at http://heather.cs.ucdavis.edu/Archive/MicrosoftClaimBelied.txt I pointed out that in that same article, Microsoft's claim that they will only move development work offshore if they can't find people to do the work here (including H-1Bs) was belied by an internal presentation by Microsoft Corporate Vice President Brian Valentine in which he urged managers to find ways to move work offshore to take advantage of cheap labor there. In other words, the claims Microsoft made in that Bloomberg article, and which it is making to Congress, are just plain dishonest. The article enclosed below further illustrates this dishonesty. Microsoft, which is saying it can't find software developers, is asking its software developer contractors to take a week off, in order to save on costs! It's not just Congress that falls for these lines. One DC-based reporter who interviewed me a few weeks ago said to me, "Well, Bill Gates told Congress that increasing the H-1B cap is Microsoft's top priority, so they must really have a shortage of qualified applicants for these jobs." It's amazing that Microsoft--"a convicted monopolist," in the recent clever words of Google--continues to have such credence, when in fact they are flagrantly distorting the truth. By the way, even Microsoft believes that many jobs must remain onshore, but they still want to save on labor costs, which is where the H-1Bs come in. Norm http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D8HP41U80.htm?campaign_id=apn_tech_down The Associated Press/SEATTLE By ALLISON LINN AP Business Writer Microsoft contractors to take 7 days off MAY. 22 6:52 P.M. ET Microsoft Corp. has told about 1,000 technology contract workers to take seven days off the job, without Microsoft pay, in a cost-saving move that came as the company unveiled a series of new perks for its internal staff. Microsoft spokesman Lou Gellos said Monday that Microsoft told vendors who supply the contractors that about 1,000 workers globally would not be needed this week. The vendors, whose workers do software development for Microsoft, also were told to schedule two other days off, Gellos said. Gellos said this was one of the first times that Microsoft has scheduled a short period of time off for its contractors. He said the company made the decision because it was running over budget in some areas as it headed toward the end of its fiscal year on June 30. He stressed that the contractors' work was being delayed, not canceled. "We want to be fiscally responsible here," Gellos said. The vendors were informed of the decision at the beginning of the month. It affects workers in Redmond, India and elsewhere, he said. Gellos also said the decision was unrelated to a move, announced late last week, to offer new perks to its Redmond employees such as enhanced child-care benefits, access to dry cleaning and grocery delivery services, and better cafeteria food. "I can understand why people might think that there is a connection, but there is not," Gellos said. Along with the new perks, Microsoft said it was rejiggering its compensation and evaluation system. The moves were widely seen as efforts to improve morale and keep up with competitors such as Google Inc. who also offer enticing benefits. Microsoft executives have said that one key to battling companies such as Google effectively is being able to get -- and keep -- talented workers. In a memo to employees, Lisa Brummel, senior vice president of human resources, called the plan "a broad set of investments we are making to ensure that Microsoft continues as one of the world's best places to work, with great opportunities, great leadership and a great working environment." Marcus Courtney, president of the Washington Alliance of Technology Workers, a tech worker advocacy group, said he thinks the two moves illustrate there is an unequal system for those who work at -- but not for -- Microsoft. "It shows the unfair relationship that they have between Microsoft and these contractors," he said. In addition to its tens of thousands of internal employees, Microsoft relies heavily on contractors for all manner of tasks. The company was involved in a long-running legal battle, beginning in the early 1990s, over its use of temporary workers, but it has since changed its practices. Bill Wilson, a software engineer who has worked as a contractor at Microsoft for about six months, said he was surprised when he found out last week that he wouldn't be working -- or getting paid -- for seven working days beginning Monday. Wilson, 57, said he might have made different financial plans if he'd known about the time off. But he was more concerned about some of his colleagues with younger kids and lower salaries. "It's gotta be quite a shock," he said. Although Microsoft said it would not pay the workers, Gellos said the companies that provide the workers were free to schedule them at other jobs during that time. But Courtney said it he thought it was unlikely that workers could line up something else so quickly. Gellos would not name the companies providing the workers. But Plano, Texas-based EDS Corp. confirmed that it contracted fewer than 25 of the workers. Companies often ask EDS to make changes like this and such flexibility is one reason they use contract workers, spokesman Travis Jacobson said. "To us, this is just business as usual," he said.